Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.73GHz-$29 318 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Memory 41 1-Core 8.7 2-Core 9.1 17% 19.6 Pts	4-Core 13.4 8-Core 14.6 2% 14 Pts	64-Core 15.1 1% 15.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080AT 80GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00000096 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 57951 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 28835840 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 11228 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8589934592000 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 507 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 32488960 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 11179 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 104 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 70012 (C2) HDA temperature 100 80 274878562352 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1228 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 454426624 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 98 98 4 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 9537 (CB) Run out cancel 100 100 2628574710074	12.9% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 22.1 Mixed 22.1 17% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.06 12% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 2048, 512 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.86% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 1.6 6% 2.17 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.86% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16