PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160224 |
Uptime | 5.3 Days |
Run Date | May 26 '18 at 19:31 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
70.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
|
20.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH1ZABHA 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M504 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
14.1%
Very poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-CK0 50GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 534x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 487x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 272x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 155x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |