Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '18 at 17:57
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 67.5 42% 60.2 Pts	4-Core 90.1 8-Core 282 20% 186 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.8% Average	Lighting 41.9 Reflection 60 Parallax 95 34% 65.6 fps	MRender 95.4 Gravity 97.9 Splatting 99.2 80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6964 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2532 (B1) Unknown 95 95 169 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 39 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 131 (F1) Unknown 99 99 31704554641	65.8% Good	Read 489 Write 383 Mixed 446 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 19.4 70% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 39.4 DQ Mixed 11.4 14% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 86%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 96GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2208 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 668 (B1) Unknown 98 98 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 53 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4486511332	54% Above average	Read 471 Write 262 Mixed 270 74% 335 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 10.2 62% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 24.5 DQ Mixed 9.39 11% 20 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 123%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 72 72 9210 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7092 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9889 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3399 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 47 386990103 (C2) HDA temperature 70 44 26274234398 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 5488382 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	55.3% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 95.1 Mixed 102 74% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.35 86% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 20,728 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 18.3 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H87-HD3 Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	171x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	138x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	87x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	62x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	20x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16