PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5KPL-AM SE (all builds) |
Memory | 1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090527 |
Uptime | 3 Days |
Run Date | May 26 '18 at 17:41 |
Run Duration | 332 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 76% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
33.1%
Below average
|
||||
42.3%
Average
|
||||
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.15%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
5.27%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples | 34x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 31x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 41x |
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 34x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $87 |