Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 25 '18 at 15:14
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 75.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 218 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 871 78% 656 Pts	64-Core 1,212 75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Lighting 46.7 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 38.5 38% 38.9 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 41.8 Splatting 36.7 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 223GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5479 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 908 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 193 193 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 262 (C2) HDA temperature 67 51 210453987361	60.6% Good	Read 497 Write 276 Mixed 279 77% 350 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 7.64 71% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 33.2 41% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 93%
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89 7,519 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1383 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 343 (A5) Unknown 100 100 34380316952 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 48 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7 (A9) Unknown 100 100 214 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 143 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 61 261993922604 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 343601119312 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1041 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2040 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1838 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1892 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	51.5% Above average	Read 380 Write 235 Mixed 229 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 9.31 64% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 8 28% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 148GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2232 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 714 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 54 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 204 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6680104582	100% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 416 Mixed 421 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 41.8 157% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 40.1 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 22.3 48% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 124%
Intenso Alu Line 16GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 9GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 6.36 Mixed 9.92 13% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.41 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 20% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 1x16GB 2,342 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.9% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	662x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	369x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	335x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	358x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	309x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	258x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	157x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	119x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	115x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	229x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	118x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $469

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16