Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131205
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	May 25 '18 at 06:31
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 191 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 363 48% 361 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420 9,903 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8450) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 1.78 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 2.39 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80 7,194 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 96GB free Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10172 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 204 (A8) Unknown 100 100 102 (AA) Unknown 100 100 297 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3670148 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 22 (C2) HDA temperature 66 58 180389675042 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 59 (DA) Unknown 100 100 59 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 9967 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4046 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4236 (F4) Unknown 100 100 56 (F5) Unknown 100 100 132 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1920384	88.5% Excellent	Read 517 Write 350 Mixed 411 94% 426 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 13.7 112% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 13.9 98% 226 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4484 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 53 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 57 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6546178100	110% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 412 Mixed 418 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 85.9 4K Mixed 45.4 167% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 126 142% 244 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 291GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 156 150 5175 (04) Start/Stop count 77 77 23146 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 34713 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2382 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 341 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 193 193 23236 (C2) HDA temperature 113 105 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.5% Average	Read 76.2 Write 67.8 Mixed 65.7 52% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.41 112% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston 9905403-174.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston 9905403-174.A00LF 12GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.6% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	216x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	145x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	91x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	49x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16