Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	May 25 '18 at 05:18
Run Duration	348 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 57 2-Core 110 52% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 240 27% 214 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 702 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 14.7 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 13.1 12% 15 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 15.2 Splatting 17.4 15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8275 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 718 (B1) Unknown 97 97 171 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 46 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 82 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33603225258	68.4% Good	Read 392 Write 382 Mixed 307 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 20.7 89% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 82 DQ Mixed 22.7 27% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 65 180087299 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 982 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5354949 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 69393786602523 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 89 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 52 655753255 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 29 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2615 (C2) HDA temperature 39 48 47244640295 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 83 65 180087299 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -11742440586781 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4065165258 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1640874865
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 132GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 171 5766 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3117 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6673 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 582 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 71 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 184 184 48196 (C2) HDA temperature 113 101 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	55.2% Above average	Read 101 Write 91.6 Mixed 98.5 73% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.3 109% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 84%
FiiO X1 USB-DISK 64GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 24GB free, PID 0003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	Read 7.5 Write 5.91 Mixed 6.01 8% 6.47 MB/s	4K Read 3.73 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 1.46 137% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IMT451U6MFR8Y-DC0 IMT451U6MFR8Y-DC0 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 18GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.8% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 14 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.7 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	112x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	4x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples	34x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples	20x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $269

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16