Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '18 at 17:11
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 244 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 632 68% 542 Pts	64-Core 634 39% 634 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% PwrHis(1787 2003) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.98% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 8.85 Parallax 3.81 5% 6.25 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 8.43 5% 5.78 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.98% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225 3,223 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14349 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1003 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 197 197 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 73 (C2) HDA temperature 74 55 193274314778 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	67.9% Good	Read 401 Write 383 Mixed 308 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 20.9 84% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 99.7 DQ Mixed 22.6 29% 50 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 2000G 2OZ 2x2GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 23.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 22.1 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 52.8 76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	120x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	67x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	60x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	25x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16