| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160617 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 23 '18 at 18:55 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4320 Quad-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
|
62.7%
Good
|
62% 100 Pts
|
29% 219 Pts
|
14% 220 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
15% 24.7 fps
|
22% 26.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
55.1%
Above average
|
71% 94.8 MB/s
|
97% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
|
65.1%
Good
|
80% 107 MB/s
|
122% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
45.5%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
28% 9.93 GB/s
|
57% 69.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |