Asus M5A78L-M LX/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LX/BR  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170304
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 23 '18 at 03:19
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 85
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 106
54% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 178
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 SE
EVGA(3842 1464) 1GB
CLim: 776 MHz, MLim: 957 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 15
Parallax 9.84
11% 12.8 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 15.7
13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 245
Write 123
Mixed 85.3
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 8.69
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 8.49
33% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 17.9
30% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 31%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
776GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 93.4
Mixed 86.9
70% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.25
71% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
471GB free
Firmware: 2AR20003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 44.4
Write 80.2
Mixed 62.2
47% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 59%
Samsung M2 Portable 500GB
182GB free, PID 60b3
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 24.1
Mixed 23.6
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.25
64% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LX/BR Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback