Asus A6K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus A6K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK A6K
Memory	1 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20050714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 20:12
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 Mobile Technology MT-32 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.6% Poor	Memory 46.1 1-Core 22.6 2-Core 18.2 22% 29 Pts	4-Core 20.4 8-Core 23 3% 21.7 Pts	64-Core 25.5 2% 25.5 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS541080G9AT00 80GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: MB4VA60A Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 155 155 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3951 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 9430 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3618 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 117401 (C2) HDA temperature 110 110 266287841330 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 5 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	10.4% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 18.8 Mixed 17.1 13% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 0.15 4K Mixed 0.11 19% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 25GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.63% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 11.2 Mixed 11.7 17% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.56 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.66 71% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.63% Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 991 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 10.8 Mixed 11.6 16% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.03 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 12% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 512 MB Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	6.06% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 1.1 MC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.7 4% 1.57 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus A6K

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)