Asus Z270-WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z270-WS  (all builds)
Memory60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '18 at 18:47
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 271
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 785
79% 639 Pts
64-Core 799
49% 799 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.3% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 54.6
Parallax 72.2
49% 62.2 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 40.9
44% 56.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
230GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 471
Mixed 499
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 26.1
129% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 81.3
135% 262 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 116%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,060
Write 539
Mixed 654
165% 751 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 33.2
147% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 50.1
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 23.1
38% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 124%
Great: 234%
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E662 1TB
715GB free
Firmware: JA0AB5D0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 92.1
Mixed 80.1
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.21
75% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270-WS Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z270-WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback