Asus P8Q77-M

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Q77-M (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121108
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 18:33
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 182 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 472 46% 378 Pts	64-Core 468 29% 468 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47% Average	Lighting 59 Reflection 57 Parallax 74.4 48% 63.5 fps	MRender 60.9 Gravity 64.5 Splatting 43.4 45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 106 14179717 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -88072599349962 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2406 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 73 (B1) Unknown 0 0 9 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14179717 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14179717 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14179717 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 31322 (EA) Unknown 0 0 31628 (F1) Unknown 0 0 31628 (F2) Unknown 0 0 39767	44.2% Average	Read 192 Write 159 Mixed 112 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 9.7 68% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 20 53% 114 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 678GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 82 (03) Spinup time 123 123 51580895862 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4563 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 35 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16778 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1750 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4808 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4808 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 227634380842 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	73.5% Very good	Read 121 Write 135 Mixed 147 102% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.23 111% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 91%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 60GB free Firmware: 01.01V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 10 (03) Spinup time 171 171 4416 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2935 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21777 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2405 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 68 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2869 (C2) HDA temperature 109 98 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 2	63.8% Good	Read 104 Write 118 Mixed 93.6 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.29 97% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 43,127 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.9 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.3 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Q77-M Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Q77-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	43x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	23x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	12x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	6x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	4x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 29%, 6,196 samples	7x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,312 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16