HP p6-2273eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP p6-2273eo  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 22 '18 at 12:47
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 359
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Device(1B0A 90B6) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 5.75
6% 6.48 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 5.52
4% 5.45 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA5R0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 147
Mixed 137
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.03
31% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback