Equus Nobilis

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Equus Nobilis (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DX79SI
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 02:30
Run Duration	313 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	76%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 182 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 556 58% 463 Pts	64-Core 688 43% 688 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2064 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 69.5 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 57.6 57% 65.1 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 64.1 Splatting 65.5 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 120GB-$80 2,344 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9815143 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -70205535419631 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 993 (0D) Soft read error rate 95 95 9815143 (64) Unknown 0 0 21317 (AA) Unknown 0 0 3520 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 120 (B1) Unknown 0 0 95 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 40 64427130911 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 64427130911 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9815143 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 120 120 -65528316035072 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9815143 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9815143 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 1 (E8) Unknown 0 0 13 (E9) Unknown 0 0 19150 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9455 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9455 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3999	53.4% Above average	Read 419 Write 132 Mixed 173 52% 241 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 14.4 74% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 49.2 64% 115 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 162 154 6866 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3759 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 13066 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1017 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 105 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 172 172 85223 (C2) HDA temperature 118 101 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	62.6% Good	Read 114 Write 104 Mixed 95.1 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.25 76% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 67%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,276 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 5.08 Mixed 7.25 12% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.51 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.008 21% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4B485831383636433944332F3447582020 4x4GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 30 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 12 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nobilis Builds (Compare 814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Equus Nobilis

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	40x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	36x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	37x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	37x

SSD
S700 250GBHP $46Bench 66%, 9,815 samples	24x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	15x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	17x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $402

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16