Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 02:12
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 78.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 242 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 903 83% 694 Pts	64-Core 1,245 77% 1,245 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 36.5 33% 35.9 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 35.7 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 3020 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1424 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3457552090591 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 56 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 22 (AE) Unknown 100 100 784 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 38 266287972403 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 29 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2151799652853 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2689 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7036 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3872 (F2) Unknown 253 253 8533 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	42.3% Average	Read 481 Write 14.6 Mixed 16.9 36% 171 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 3.59 63% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 2.14 30% 74.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 71%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 996GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 83 (03) Spinup time 134 134 38683541992 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 997 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1185 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 829 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1000 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1000 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 206159609895 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	55.2% Above average	Read 94.4 Write 98.2 Mixed 93 72% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.13 37% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 930GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 171 2058 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2140 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3418 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1324 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 633 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7817 (C2) HDA temperature 111 100 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	101% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 171 Mixed 160 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 2.66 4K Mixed 0.37 141% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 78GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2032 (03) Spinup time 143 138 3850 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1631 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29585 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 996 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 1 2030 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4 (BE) vendor-specific 63 53 740556837 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 412 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1287 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 199 29 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 199 29 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 37	20.4% Poor	Read 53.8 Write 17.4 Mixed 15.6 21% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.45 4K Mixed 0.28 57% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB 12,708 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (96^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 26.7 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 23.8 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	114x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16