Acer Aspire M5800

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Acer Aspire M5800 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EG43M
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20090811
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	May 21 '18 at 17:01
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115 20,482 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 35.9 2-Core 71.7 41% 60.4 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 139 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% PNY(196E 11C7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 18.7 16% 17.9 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 20.5 16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 32025 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 468 (B1) Unknown 73 73 969 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 51 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 142 (EB) Unknown 99 99 232 (F1) Unknown 99 99 39020013207	32.5% Below average	Read 248 Write 100 Mixed 76.4 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 6.79 44% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 23.4 DQ Mixed 34.8 38% 68.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 917GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 111 107 7425 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2301 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36207 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1652 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 190 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 698486 (C2) HDA temperature 113 96 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 195 194 820 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 197 197 607 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 124 (C8) Write error rate 190 189 2147	62.1% Good	Read 108 Write 109 Mixed 10.6 54% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.34 90% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 57%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 908GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 133 3925 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4397 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6161 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 107 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 172 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11566 (C2) HDA temperature 110 97 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.8% Good	Read 109 Write 120 Mixed 11.1 58% 80 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.75 4K Mixed 0.28 124% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 79%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 396GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 114 (03) Spinup time 162 159 4866 (04) Start/Stop count 73 73 27426 (05) Reallocated sector count 154 154 363 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 45734 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2562 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 315 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 27426 (C2) HDA temperature 112 77 35 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 302 (C5) Current pending sector count 192 187 902 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 197 187 363 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 193 178 916	54.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 88.1 Mixed 76.8 67% 89 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.47 119% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 195GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 219305430 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10338 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 4317711620 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19420 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 464 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 49 806354982 (C2) HDA temperature 38 51 42949672998 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 45 25 219305430 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -95726231071517 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4176850946 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3479842671	55.1% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 93.7 Mixed 40 57% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.48 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 1066 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M5800 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire M5800

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	4x
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x
GeForce GT 440NvidiaBench 4%, 14,286 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 80CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 80CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 80CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 6GBUnknownBench 21%, 75 samples	1x
HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 38%, 703 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $115

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer Aspire M5800

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer Aspire M5800

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)