Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 21 '18 at 14:39
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 97.7 1-Core 131 2-Core 257 91% 162 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 591 69% 534 Pts	64-Core 682 42% 682 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8592) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 150 Parallax 139 111% 142 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 131 Splatting 108 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 29193186 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 -20375324832481 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3299 (AB) Unknown 0 0 2 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 239 (B1) Unknown 0 0 12 (B5) Unknown 0 0 2 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 29193186 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 29193186 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 29193186 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 36045 (EA) Unknown 0 0 31295 (F1) Unknown 0 0 31295 (F2) Unknown 0 0 30727	71% Very good	Read 501 Write 132 Mixed 189 59% 274 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 17 125% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 40.5 61% 116 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 82%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 96GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 83 83 5930 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10063 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 16102 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3914 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 13 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 63 386596887 (C2) HDA temperature 73 61 453705755 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 11341 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 82 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	43% Average	Read 72.1 Write 77.4 Mixed 78.9 58% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.42 99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 81GB free Firmware: 0502 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 38.1 Write 41 Mixed 38.6 30% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.19 60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 67%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 87GB free Firmware: VT100-41 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 40 1 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6336 (04) Start/Stop count 76 76 24640 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28059 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6781 (BB) vendor-specific 67 67 3735586 (BE) vendor-specific 145 97 31 (C2) HDA temperature 145 97 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 72206 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 99 99 15 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 11227 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 75 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 92 92 2720	35.9% Below average	Read 61.4 Write 63.5 Mixed 60.5 47% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.3 78% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 38%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB 4,635 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 569GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 40.7 Write 38.1 Mixed 31.3 46% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 26GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 37 Mixed 16.8 37% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.25 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 3x8GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	68.1% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 20.2 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 23 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 47.4 84% 47.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,617x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	442x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	403x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	156x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	109x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16