Toshiba PORTAGE X30-D

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba PORTAGE X30-D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Repair PCB
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 21 '18 at 13:55
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	46%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 181 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 277 38% 281 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Toshiba(1179 0005) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 8.65 Parallax 5.41 6% 6.99 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 6.23 Splatting 12.2 7% 8.09 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK512GVN8 512GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 289GB free (System drive) Firmware: K8TA4101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1100 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1712 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 195 195 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 81 (C2) HDA temperature 51 42 249108693041 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 128353 (F2) Unknown 100 100 104438 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	67.8% Good	Read 484 Write 252 Mixed 327 78% 354 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 23 102% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 79.3 DQ Mixed 15.3 22% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 85%
SAMSUNG MZNTE256HMHP-000 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 63GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.9% Very good	Read 39.8 Write 39.5 Mixed 39.6 51% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 7.81 927% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 12.5 DQ Write 18.5 DQ Mixed 8.22 954% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 36,753 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.7% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 10.6 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16