Samsung 700G7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSamsung 700G7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '18 at 04:33
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 430
46% 365 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 675M
Sanyo(144D C0D0) 2GB
CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 13.5
12% 15.4 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 16.3
14% 17 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 497
Write 216
Mixed 287
73% 333 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 16.1
71% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 56.4
74% 141 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 76%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
265GB free
Firmware: JF3O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 86.3
Write 78.9
Mixed 88.3
64% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.22
54% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 68.6
Write 76.9
Mixed 58.2
88% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.22
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 55%
Seagate Backup+ BL 1TB
58GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 79.2
Mixed 64.9
92% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.29
67% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700G7C Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700G7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback