HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180212
Uptime	8.7 Days
Run Date	May 20 '18 at 22:35
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 178 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 345 47% 349 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 9010 (05) Reallocated sector count 98 98 32 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16344 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 78 (64) Unknown 100 100 6844544 (65) Unknown 100 100 842912 (AA) Unknown 100 100 32 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 83 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 94 94 2037 (B2) Unknown 100 100 2 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1261 (B7) Unknown 98 98 20 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 8632 (C2) HDA temperature 27 100 201864445979 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 9010 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 32 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 378 (E7) Temperature 95 95 5 (E9) Unknown 100 100 12149 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4472 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10003 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11997 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 267970	46.4% Average	Read 475 Write 160 Mixed 256 65% 297 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 5.31 45% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 56.4 DQ Mixed 22.2 40% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 88%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 526GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 183 141 7833 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4163 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 23780 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3477 (C0) Power-off retract count 196 196 3140 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 164 164 110116 (C2) HDA temperature 117 92 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.3% Above average	Read 92.4 Write 89.9 Mixed 112 75% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.21 79% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 600 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2.5TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 167 Write 191 Mixed 134 211% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.23 66% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13.5 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.2 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,465x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,464x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	797x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,921x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	725x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	488x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	266x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	56x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16