| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100820 |
| Uptime | 1.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 20 '18 at 21:29 |
| Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.9%
Very good
|
68% 112 Pts
|
41% 332 Pts
|
25% 406 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 465
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 801 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
15% 22.8 fps
|
17% 20.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
59.9%
Above average
|
58% 80.2 MB/s
|
79% 0.66 MB/s
| |
|
Fujitsu MHV2080BH PL 80GB
15GB free
Firmware: 00000029 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
20% 27.4 MB/s
|
62% 0.52 MB/s
| |
|
WD 1200BEA External 120GB
20GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
26% 22.5 MB/s
|
49% 0.58 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
41.9%
Average
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
69% 57.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H55M-S2 Builds (Compare 286 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 67x |
| Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 35x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 34x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 30x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 16x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $88 |