ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel D945GCL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	INTEL_ D945GCL_
Motherboard	Intel D945GCL (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '18 at 10:30
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.66GHz-$129 394 User benchmarks, average bench 26% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 58.2 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 42.3 29% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 42.4 8-Core 44 6% 43.2 Pts	64-Core 43.7 3% 43.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 9480676 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 79 79 22412 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 336504115 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 9942 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 11218 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 236226805857 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 111 (BE) vendor-specific 63 49 622919717 (C2) HDA temperature 37 51 64424509477 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 27 9480676 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 120 32810 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -42704859785041 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2526914732 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2620729038	61.1% Good	Read 111 Write 102 Mixed 31.7 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.46 106% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 40GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 198 197 33278 (03) Spinup time 171 167 4408 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10228 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18745 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7187 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1323 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8904 (C2) HDA temperature 105 88 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.4% Good	Read 109 Write 109 Mixed 28.6 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.39 114% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 69%
Seagate ST380211AS 80GB 765 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 24GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 81 69334877 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 79 79 22509 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 285696269 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 11186 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 82 82 19126 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 40 723779627 (C2) HDA temperature 43 60 73014444075 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 69 45 124402241 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	37.1% Below average	Read 62.6 Write 66.4 Mixed 35 40% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.43 90% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 40%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 21.8 Write 9.03 Mixed 11.1 16% 14 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 1.33 122% 2.54 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback