Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '18 at 17:06
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 86.9
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 104
53% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 183
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 39.8
38% 39.5 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 37.8
33% 40 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ts240gss D220S 240GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFR Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 291
Write 369
Mixed 414
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 9.35
92% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 14.5
68% 153 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
256GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 114
Write 102
Mixed 99.4
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.31
81% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 69%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
142GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 55.4
Mixed 35.3
36% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.27
76% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
115GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 60.9
Mixed 59.2
47% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.4
96% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
146GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 117
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.46
115% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
WD WD1600AAJB-00PVA0 160GB
53GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 73.3
Write 78.1
Mixed 52.7
51% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.39
109% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-002.A00LF 99U5458-002.A00LF 9905471-001.A01LF 9905471-001.A01LF 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.7
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback