| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit farger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150423 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 18 '18 at 09:19 |
| Run Duration | 101 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
74.2%
Very good
|
76% 134 Pts
|
55% 442 Pts
|
32% 521 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.9
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
16% 17.8 fps
|
14% 18 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
72.1%
Very good
|
96% 127 MB/s
|
15% 0.22 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
61.6%
Good
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
55% 73.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,947 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z440 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,235x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,033x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 859x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 739x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 374x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |