| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170221 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 17 '18 at 23:53 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
68.7%
Good
|
62% 109 Pts
|
60% 510 Pts
|
66% 1074 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
|
23.5%
Poor
|
23% 31.1 fps
|
25% 30 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
70.4%
Very good
|
98% 439 MB/s
|
79% 25.4 MB/s
|
17% 28.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
87.8%
Excellent
|
101% 35.3 GB/s
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
43% 93.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,977 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 339x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 268x |
| Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 143x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 126x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |