Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '18 at 19:54
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 143 2-Core 279 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 914 88% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,083 67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 147 Parallax 131 109% 137 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 134 Splatting 108 96% 118 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75 5,727 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17336 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3975 (B1) Unknown 100 100 947263 (B2) Unknown 100 100 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 1 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 357 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5427 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 584611 (F2) Unknown 100 100 753615	68.8% Good	Read 494 Write 209 Mixed 293 73% 332 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 20.5 106% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 66.2 65% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 235GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 170 2150 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2120 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3567 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 666 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 15 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5262 (C2) HDA temperature 108 105 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.4% Good	Read 107 Write 110 Mixed 102 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.2 91% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99 5,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1GB free Firmware: 3.03 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 56 53 232404739 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15488 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 658289866 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 54966 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7233 (C2) HDA temperature 41 48 47244640297 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 52 232404739 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	25.6% Poor	Read 44.2 Write 44.9 Mixed 41.2 33% 43.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.76 4K Mixed 0.23 55% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C19 2x8GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.1% Average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.5 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,693x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	835x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	172x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	394x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	335x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	228x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	144x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	124x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	219x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	147x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	112x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $974

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16