Lenovo 81A5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81A5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 18:32
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Memory 15.8
1-Core 36
2-Core 57.3
20% 36.4 Pts
4-Core 75.5
8-Core 80.9
10% 78.2 Pts
64-Core 79.7
5% 79.7 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4627
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.09
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.7
2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4032 31GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 165
Write 95.6
Mixed 122
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 6.69
4K Mixed 2.93
16% 5.24 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4F8E304HB-MGCJ 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 353
11% 353 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81A5 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81A5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback