Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, RAM
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGbt___ GBTUACPI  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 18:26
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$196
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
37.2% Below average
SC Int 66.7
SC Float 40.4
SC Mixed 50.4
42% 52.5 Pts
QC Int 257
QC Float 140
QC Mixed 195
45% 197 Pts
MC Int 242
MC Float 157
MC Mixed 194
30% 198 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$210
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 152
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 224
55% 157 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 163
Splatting 106
50% 114 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$88
62GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 84.6
Write 79.6
Mixed 78.9
61% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.26
96% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$83
196GB free
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 84.6
Write 83
Mixed 78.9
62% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.44
103% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results
Typical GBTUACPI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 24%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ GBTUACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $189
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback