Dell Latitude E6520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Dell Latitude E6520 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0J4TFW
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180306
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 17 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 152 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 402 45% 351 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 1494) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.9679 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,365 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 4 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3078 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1188 (AF) Unknown 99 99 4 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B2) Unknown 79 79 416 (B3) Unknown 79 79 820 (B4) Unknown 79 79 3212 (B5) Unknown 99 99 4 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 4 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E8) Unknown 79 79 1600 (F1) Unknown 13 13 3766674203 (F2) Unknown 22 22 3377220927	41.6% Average	Read 248 Write 236 Mixed 205 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 8.67 44% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 71.7 DQ Mixed 12.7 32% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 27.9 Write 4.31 Mixed 6.66 12% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.53 4K Write 0.005 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 7,983 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Latitude E6520 Builds (Compare 1,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6520

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	315x
Core i7-2760QMIntel $130Bench 60%, 10,423 samples	184x
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	144x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	715x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	298x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	96x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	31x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	54x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	41x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 268 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16