Asus X751LJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X751LJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X751LJ
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151207
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 18:16
Run Duration75 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 27.3
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 48.2
22% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 98.3
8-Core 138
15% 118 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 241A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 4.63
11% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R2J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 86.8
Mixed 89.2
69% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.19
56% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X751LJ Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X751LJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback