MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 17:24
Run Duration394 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 281
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 766
80% 642 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2962) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 45
Parallax 39.8
37% 43.4 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 36.3
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
690GB free
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 374
Write 397
Mixed 391
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 26.2
122% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 26.4
49% 90.8 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
291GB free
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 374
Write 398
Mixed 392
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 25.3
123% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 39.3
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 26.9
31% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,656
Write 1,735
Mixed 1,930
467% 2,107 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 59.4
241% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 513
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 41
152% 336 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 307%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 PRO 1TB
232GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 493
Mixed 507
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 25
130% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 24
35% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB
182GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 491
Mixed 507
113% 505 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 26.3
139% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 24.3
92% 202 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
148GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 494
Mixed 509
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 27.3
141% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 25.3
35% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB
110GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 491
Mixed 508
113% 504 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 45.3
145% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 26.7
104% 232 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
30GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 410
Mixed 423
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 21.1
117% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 114
137% 240 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 127%
WD Elements 2TB
826GB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 83.4
Mixed 78.8
105% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 1078 2TB
363GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 66.1
Write 60.6
Mixed 60.3
79% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.23
74% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 43%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB
75GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
445% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 478
Mixed 483
620% 479 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 21.3
3,776% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 84.2
DQ Mixed 27.3
3,934% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 445%
Great: 377%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 32GB
17GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 31.2
Mixed 14.6
32% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.82
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.04
36% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 25.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $601
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback