Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 15:32
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3 540-$94
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33% Below average
SC Int 48.9
SC Float 61
SC Mixed 61.1
46% 57 Pts
QC Int 138
QC Float 147
QC Mixed 142
32% 143 Pts
MC Int 172
MC Float 192
MC Mixed 183
27% 182 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Intel(8086 0046) 732MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2342
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.8
1% 2.53 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.3
1% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$57
816GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 88.5
Mixed 32.2
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.24
4K Mixed 0.09
18% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 0.1
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 26%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $153
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback