User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121207
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 15:12
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-3470-$145
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.8% Above average
SC Int 42.1
SC Float 46.9
SC Mixed 44.9
36% 44.6 Pts
QC Int 230
QC Float 281
QC Mixed 321
63% 277 Pts
MC Int 358
MC Float 376
MC Mixed 374
55% 369 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1117) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 10.5
4% 12 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 7.1
4% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 9%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS5C1025CLA382 250GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC1OR39G
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 100
Mixed 104
75% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.28
66% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $245AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback