Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110N
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180110
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 17 '18 at 09:44
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 197 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 380 50% 376 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 37.4 33% 36.5 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 36.4 31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 500GB 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 568 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 105 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 29 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3172214418	100% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 494 Mixed 503 112% 501 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 29.3 121% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 29.2 95% 206 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 22.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 20.8 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110N-CF Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	34x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	29x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x

SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,606 samples	6x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	5x

RAM
M378A5244CB0-CTD Kingston 9905622-057.A00G 8GBSamsungBench 65%, 10 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	6x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB 12GBSamsungBench 55%, 44 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16