Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 07:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-8350-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.7% Good
SC Int 86.3
SC Float 75.8
SC Mixed 79.6
64% 80.6 Pts
QC Int 315
QC Float 277
QC Mixed 301
68% 298 Pts
MC Int 519
MC Float 446
MC Mixed 506
74% 490 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$456
EVGA(3842 5180) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2730 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 395
Reflection 388
Parallax 414
124% 399 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 395
Splatting 251
130% 298 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 128%
Great: 140%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
AMD 3+0 Stripe/RAID0 381GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
89GB free, PID 231c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 8,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $734
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $333Nvidia GTX 1070 $383Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback