Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 02:26
Run Duration61 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700-$299
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
SC Int 123
SC Float 130
SC Mixed 127
101% 127 Pts
QC Int 412
QC Float 453
QC Mixed 447
99% 437 Pts
MC Int 619
MC Float 696
MC Mixed 670
99% 662 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 96%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$44
712GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 138
Mixed 120
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.2
78% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905702-010.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $169Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i7-8700K $325Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $295Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $960SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback