User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 days ago, 4 days ago.
SystemPegatron SM 3330
MotherboardPegatron SM3330
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 01:37
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Phenom II X4 850
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.2% Below average
SC Int 77.9
SC Float 44.2
SC Mixed 55.2
47% 59.1 Pts
QC Int 244
QC Float 138
QC Mixed 168
42% 184 Pts
MC Int 260
MC Float 160
MC Mixed 202
32% 207 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Device(1B0A 00E5) 640MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 1.6
1% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.6
1% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$55
681GB free
Firmware: G001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 95.9
Mixed 31.9
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.19
51% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $296Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $960SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback