Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	43.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '18 at 00:36
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 73.2 1-Core 119 2-Core 236 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 840 79% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,303 81% 1,303 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	78.7% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 112 Parallax 107 83% 107 fps	MRender 86.4 Gravity 92.4 Splatting 79.9 70% 86.2 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3056 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 271 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 60 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 102 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3608255318	100% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 407 Mixed 419 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 42 152% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 78.7 86% 146 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 124%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 138 138 12910199170 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 597 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3169 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 211 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 698 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 698 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 201864708133 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	108% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 185 Mixed 180 139% 185 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 4.37 4K Mixed 0.49 180% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 140 140 12909871485 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 547 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3169 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 207 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 648 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 648 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 210454642725 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	98% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 169 Mixed 194 135% 178 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 4.61 4K Mixed 0.44 172% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3000C14-16GVR F4-3000C14-16GVR Kingston M378A1K43BB2-CRC Kingston M378A1K43BB2-CRC 48GB 2197, 2197, 2197, 2197 MHz 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 18.3 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 22 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 94.1 42% 94.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16