Asus X99-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150303
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 16 '18 at 23:53
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
77.7% Very good
SC Int 94.4
SC Float 106
SC Mixed 92.6
78% 97.5 Pts
QC Int 362
QC Float 405
QC Mixed 391
87% 386 Pts
MC Int 672
MC Float 749
MC Mixed 753
108% 725 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0783) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 163
Reflection 126
Parallax 201
55% 163 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 185
Splatting 108
62% 143 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$120
48GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 410
Mixed 419
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 42.7
145% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 102
110% 186 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$95
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 404
Mixed 416
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 41
141% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 95.7
107% 182 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 125%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 86.9
Write 85.8
Mixed 66.9
60% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.05
4K Mixed 0.45
212% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$56
329GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67% Good
Read 122
Write 111
Mixed 116
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.19
92% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67%
Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
753GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 41.4
Mixed 9.85
36% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.22
61% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$317
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 22.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 92%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,061
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $333Nvidia GTX 1070 $383Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback