Asus MAXIMUS IX APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX APEX  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '18 at 22:39
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 98.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 838
86% 692 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 171
Parallax 134
116% 149 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 177
Splatting 129
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 8.34
7% 9.68 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 7.63
Splatting 16.4
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
324GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 351
Mixed 359
90% 407 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 29.5
148% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 101
126% 227 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
181GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 1,191
Mixed 1,210
328% 1,488 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 47.5
218% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 560
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 208
230% 391 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 242%
Great: 236%
PNY SSD2SC240GD4DH08B-T 240GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 506
Write 258
Mixed 320
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 25.7
138% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 37
81% 168 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 95%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
137GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,111
Write 1,250
Mixed 1,200
335% 1,520 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 47.1
217% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 569
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 218
238% 403 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 248%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
36GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 415
Mixed 423
100% 452 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 50.6
188% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 129
144% 245 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 30.9
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 34.9
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 44
91% 44 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX APEX Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $803
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback