Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H87M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130407
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 16 '18 at 18:08
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4770-$305
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.5% Very good
SC Int 108
SC Float 107
SC Mixed 108
86% 108 Pts
QC Int 359
QC Float 354
QC Mixed 354
81% 356 Pts
MC Int 484
MC Float 541
MC Mixed 524
77% 516 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$370
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 176
Reflection 166
Parallax 181
55% 174 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 158
Splatting 117
60% 140 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 482
Write 108
Mixed 157
54% 249 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 8.71
91% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 99.2
DQ Mixed 9.32
22% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$49
240GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 147
Write 117
Mixed 131
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.17
85% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
794GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 93.8
128% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.21
83% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $473
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $333Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback