| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110621 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 16 '18 at 16:08 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 70% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.5%
Above average
|
48% 74.1 Pts
|
30% 225 Pts
|
13% 206 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.1%
Above average
|
58% 69.4 fps
|
54% 66.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
40.3%
Average
|
38% 52.3 MB/s
|
27% 0.22 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion 1TB
636GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
22.3%
Poor
|
33% 26 MB/s
|
155% 1.85 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.4%
Below average
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
22% 7.57 GB/s
|
42% 95.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 376 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 62x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 41x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 54x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |