Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320MA-M.2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170519
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '18 at 13:12
Run Duration	453 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 206 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 694 68% 554 Pts	64-Core 852 53% 852 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60% Above average	Lighting 75.2 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 64.5 61% 71.6 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 69 Splatting 70.3 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP600 256GB 4,724 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 776 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 138 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 45 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1245192 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 196 196 12890800149 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1085 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C2) HDA temperature 71 71 133145690141 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 10799502080 (EA) Unknown 100 100 23831360832 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3912592703 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6626330058	76.7% Very good	Read 465 Write 295 Mixed 362 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 61.3 4K Mixed 23 102% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 35.4 76% 155 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 230GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 73 (03) Spinup time 126 126 25789530413 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 160 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 828 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 131 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 160 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 160 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 146030067739 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	70.7% Very good	Read 101 Write 146 Mixed 151 101% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.18 91% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 108%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB 13,068 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 10GB free Firmware: 3.AAF Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5098 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 405030562 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16242 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 5075 (BB) vendor-specific 86 86 14 (BD) vendor-specific 16 16 84 (BE) vendor-specific 71 51 822738973 (C2) HDA temperature 29 49 42949672989 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 78 60 76845455 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 265 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33.2% Below average	Read 58.1 Write 57.5 Mixed 55.8 43% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.35 80% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 53%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Read 17.6 Write 3.14 Mixed 4.51 8% 8.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 1% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FDD2 4x4GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 27.8 84% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 30.5 SC Mixed 23.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320MA-M.2-CF Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	14x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	13x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	12x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $311

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16