Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151015
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 16 '18 at 06:31
Run Duration367 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 653
64% 524 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 7.44
6% 8.61 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 7
Splatting 15.5
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ext SSD 240GB
35GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 355
Write 298
Mixed 315
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 4.26
52% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 4.47
11% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200L00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 489
Write 172
Mixed 249
66% 303 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 15.9
74% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 51.2
74% 139 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 144
Write 133
Mixed 119
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.28
93% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
374GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 133
106% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.17
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 107
Write 110
Mixed 65.7
118% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.17
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%
WD My Book 1TB
532GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 42
Mixed 38.8
52% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.33
69% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 22%
Innostor USB3.0 126GB
81GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 105
Write 17.5
Mixed 13.4
40% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.29
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.21
31% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 28%
WD My Book 1TB
81GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 42.5
Write 52,417
42,217% 26,230 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback