Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.35% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
1 month ago, 9 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '18 at 18:03
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.1% Average
SC Int 83.4
SC Float 71.6
SC Mixed 76.5
62% 77.2 Pts
QC Int 249
QC Float 211
QC Mixed 241
53% 233 Pts
MC Int 244
MC Float 197
MC Mixed 243
34% 228 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.101.0.0
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 22.2
5% 17.6 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 12.3
6% 12.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intenso 128GB 128GB
29GB free
Firmware: O0213E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ !4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 318
Write 160
Mixed 103
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 2.33
36% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 19.4
DQ Mixed 3.55
7% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
699GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5700 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 113
Mixed 27.2
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.37
86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59%
Great: 63%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$21
5GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 29.5
Mixed 27.3
38% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.43
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.23
46% 3.25 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 51%
Generic USB 2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
Read 19.8
Write 21.7
Mixed 20.8
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.03
4K Write 5.14
4K Mixed 2.2
261% 3.46 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 36%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical FM2A85X Extreme6 Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $294
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $136
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback