Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 04:02
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 185
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 359
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3264) 1GB
CLim: 1047 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 30.5
21% 27.8 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 32.4
22% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 370
Write 253
Mixed 226
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 8.16
60% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 34.9
DQ Mixed 9.76
13% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 123
Write 116
Mixed 80.5
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.16
65% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
497GB free
Firmware: CC51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 110
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 96%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB
326GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 78.6
Write 75.4
Mixed 72.7
97% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.23
24% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 31%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
23GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Read 32
Write 9.85
Mixed 9.8
18% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.04
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
21% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $235
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback