Huananzhi X79

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '18 at 03:20
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$95 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 182 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 550 54% 445 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Gigabyte(1458 3628) 3GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 361.75 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.9% Above average	Lighting 67.7 Reflection 69.4 Parallax 87.7 55% 75 fps	MRender 81.3 Gravity 60.4 Splatting 51.7 51% 64.5 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28792 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1064 (B1) Unknown 92 92 270 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 56 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 104 (F1) Unknown 99 99 58301105001	55.7% Above average	Read 266 Write 175 Mixed 212 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 20 88% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 72.5 84% 145 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 118%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 171 8116 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5627 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 28235 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1059 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 124 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 43168 (C2) HDA temperature 126 107 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71% Very good	Read 135 Write 112 Mixed 91.3 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.19 82% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 206 178 6691 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12947 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 28134 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1050 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 86 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 180 180 62409 (C2) HDA temperature 126 108 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	63.3% Good	Read 119 Write 101 Mixed 72 72% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.18 79% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-829.A 4x8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 36.6 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 12.2 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	120x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	66x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
AS2280P4 256GBApacerBench 168%, 1,607 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	56x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16