PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120308 |
Uptime | 3 Days |
Run Date | May 13 '18 at 07:07 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
72.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
74.6%
Very good
|
|||
95.6%
Outstanding
|
||||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
83GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
46.8%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 1,519x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 947x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 556x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 309x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 268x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 236x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $581 |