QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3.9 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 18:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 191
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 372
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
PwrHis(1787 2337) 2GB
CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 43.9
30% 37.6 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 38.6
27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 429GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x5GB
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback